Effect of stimulus cycle time on acute respiratory responses to intermittent hypercapnic hypoxia in unsedated piglets.
To determine whether stimulus frequency affects physiological compensation to an intermittent respiratory stimulus, we studied piglets (n = 43) aged 14.8 +/- 2.4 days. A 24-min total hypercapnic hypoxia (HH) (10% O(2)-6% CO(2)-balance N(2) = HH) was delivered in 24-, 8-, 4-, or 2-min cycles alternating with air. Controls (n = 10) breathed air continuously. Minute ventilation and temperature were not different between the 2-min and 24-min groups, with neither different from controls during recovery. Piglets exposed to 8-min cycles had ventilatory stimulation, whereas those exposed to 4-min cycles had significant depression of ventilation. Despite this, piglets in these intermediate intermittent HH ( IHH) groups (8- and 4-min cycles) showed more severe acidosis and attenuated temperature changes (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01 for pH and temperature vs. 24 min, respectively). Cycle time affected the ability of young piglets to tolerate IHH. More severe respiratory acidosis developed when IHH was delivered in intermediate (4 min or 8 min) cycles compared with the same total dose as a single episode or in short (2 min) cycles.[1]References
- Effect of stimulus cycle time on acute respiratory responses to intermittent hypercapnic hypoxia in unsedated piglets. Waters, K.A., Tinworth, K.D. J. Appl. Physiol. (2003) [Pubmed]
Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenesOpen Access LicencePrivacy PolicyTerms of Use
The world's first wiki where authorship really matters (Nature Genetics, 2008). Due credit and reputation for authors. Imagine a global collaborative knowledge base for original thoughts. Search thousands of articles and collaborate with scientists around the globe.








