Ascorbate-dependent recycling of the vitamin E homologue Trolox by dihydrolipoate and glutathione in murine skin homogenates.
In the redox antioxidant network, dihydrolipoate can synergistically enhance the ascorbate-dependent recycling of vitamin E. Since the major endogenous thiol antioxidant in biological systems is glutathione (GSH) it was of interest to compare the effects of dihydrolipoate with GSH on ascorbate-dependent recycling of the water-soluble homologue of vitamin E, Trolox, by electron spin resonance (ESR). Trolox phenoxyl radicals were generated by a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) oxidation system. In the presence of dihydrolipoate, Trolox radicals were suppressed until both dihydrolipoate and endogenous levels of ascorbate in skin homogenates were consumed. Similar experiments made in the presence of GSH revealed that Trolox radicals reappeared immediately after ascorbate was depleted and that GSH was not able to drive the ascorbate-dependent Trolox recycling reaction. However, at higher concentrations GSH was able to increase ascorbate-mediated Trolox regeneration from the Trolox radical. ESR and spectrophotometric measurements demonstrated the ability of dihydrolipoate or GSH to react with dehydroascorbate, the two-electron oxidation product of ascorbate in this system. Dihydrolipoate regenerated greater amounts of ascorbate at a much faster rate than equivalent concentrations of GSH. Thus the marked difference between the rate and efficiency of ascorbate generation by dihydrolipoate as compared with GSH appears to account for the different kinetics by which these thiol antioxidants influence ascorbate-dependent Trolox recycling.[1]References
- Ascorbate-dependent recycling of the vitamin E homologue Trolox by dihydrolipoate and glutathione in murine skin homogenates. Guo, Q., Packer, L. Free Radic. Biol. Med. (2000) [Pubmed]
Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenesOpen Access LicencePrivacy PolicyTerms of Useapsburg









