The world's first wiki where authorship really matters (Nature Genetics, 2008). Due credit and reputation for authors. Imagine a global collaborative knowledge base for original thoughts. Search thousands of articles and collaborate with scientists around the globe.

wikigene or wiki gene protein drug chemical gene disease author authorship tracking collaborative publishing evolutionary knowledge reputation system wiki2.0 global collaboration genes proteins drugs chemicals diseases compound
Hoffmann, R. A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters. Nature Genetics (2008)
 
 
 
 
 

Comparison of the periplasmic receptors for L-arabinose, D-glucose/D-galactose, and D-ribose. Structural and Functional Similarity.

The primary sequence of the receptor for L-arabinose or Ara-binding protein ( ABP) composed of 306 residues is very different from the D-glucose/D-galactose-binding protein (GGBP) which consists of 309 residues. Nevertheless, superimpositioning of the well-refined high resolution structures of ABP in complex with D-galactose and the GGBP in complex with D-glucose shows very similar structures; 220 of the residues (or about 70%) have a root mean square deviation of 2.0 A. From the superpositioning, nine pairs of continuous segments (consisting of 8-51 residues), mainly alpha-helices and beta-strands that form the core of the two lobes of the bilobate proteins were found to exhibit strong sequence homology. The equivalenced structures and aligned sequences show that many of the polar, as well as aromatic residues, in the sugar-binding sites located in the cleft between the two lobes are highly conserved. Surprisingly, however, the exact mode of binding of the D-galactose in ABP is totally different from that of the D-glucose in GGBP. Using the structurally aligned sequences of the ABP and GGBP as a template, we have matched the sequence of the ribose-binding protein ( RBP) which consists of 271 residues with the ABP/GGBP pair. Although the nine aligned segments of all three proteins show little sequence identity, they have significant homology. Four additional segments of RBP were matched only with GGBP, leading to the alignment of about 90% of the RBP sequence with the GGBP sequence. Many of the conserved residues in the binding sites of ABP and GGBP matched with similar residues in RBP. Additional observations indicate that the GGBP/ RBP pair is more closely related than the ABP/ RBP or ABP/GGBP pair. All three binding proteins, which may have diverged from a common ancestor, serve as primary receptors for bacterial high affinity active transport systems. Moreover, GGBP and RBP, but not ABP, also act as receptors for chemotaxis. An exposed site located in one domain, which includes Gly74, for interacting with the trg transmembrane signal transducer that is involved in triggering chemotaxis has been located in the structure of GGBP (Vyas, N.K., Vyas, M.N., and Quiocho, F.A. (1988) Science 242, 1290-1295). Whereas the site is absent in the structure of ABP, it is strongly predicted to be present in RBP which shares the same trg transducer with GGBP. The knowledge-based alignment of RBP further revealed two possible additional peripheral chemotactic sites that show high structural and sequence similarity between GGBP and RBP only. At least one of these sites, together with the one proven to exist in the other domain, could be used by the signal transducer with which both binding proteins interact in a way which the substrate-loaded "closed cleft" structure could be discriminated from the unliganded "open cleft" form by the transducer.[1]

References

 
WikiGenes - Universities