Dynamic responses to intravenous urapidil and dihydralazine in normal subjects.
Hemodynamic responses after urapidil were compared with those after dihydralazine in placebo-controlled, double-blind studies after cumulative intravenous doses. We recorded heart rate, blood pressure, systolic time intervals corrected for heart rate (electromechanical systole and preejection period), electrical impedance cardiography [(dZ/dt)/RZ index and mean electrical thorax impedance], and M-mode echocardiogram (end-systolic and -diastolic diameters, end-systolic wall stress, fractional shortening, and cardiac output). Both drugs induced dose-dependent reductions in total peripheral resistance, which resulted in reduction in left ventricular end-systolic wall stress and increases in heart rate (limited at +10 bpm with urapidil), fractional shortening, cardiac output, and the (dZ/dt)/RZ index. With each drug, diastolic blood pressure fell by 5 mm Hg, the corrected preejection period shortened (dihydralazine greater than urapidil), the corrected electromechanical systole did not change, and mean electrical thorax impedance rose with urapidil. The spectrum of effects indicates that both drugs reduce left ventricular afterload, thereby increasing left ventricular pump performance. Urapidil also exerts some preload reduction.[1]References
- Dynamic responses to intravenous urapidil and dihydralazine in normal subjects. Belz, G.G., Matthews, J.H., Graf, D., Stern, H.C., Bachmann, R., Belz, G., Steinijans, V.W., Palm, D. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. (1985) [Pubmed]
Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenesOpen Access LicencePrivacy PolicyTerms of Useapsburg
