Evaluation of advanced cardiac life support in a community teaching hospital by use of actual cardiac arrests.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the retention of Advanced Cardiac Life Support training of internal medicine residents as a function of the time since successfully completing ACLS training. DESIGN: Prospective, consecutive sample of patients who underwent a cardiopulmonary resuscitation effort directed by physicians who successfully completed ACLS. SETTING: Eastern community teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 180 consecutive patients over the age of 18 years who sustained a cardiopulmonary arrest and whose resuscitation efforts were directed by physicians who successfully completed ACLS. Forty-five additional resuscitative efforts hospital wide were led by non-ACLS-trained physicians during the study period. OUTCOME MEASURES: Correctness of the diagnosis of rhythms and treatment of the rhythms diagnosed were assessed, as per ACLS protocols in effect at the time of the study, in 1991. INTERVENTION: None. RESULTS: Chi-squares were used for analysis. Seventy-six of the resuscitative efforts were run by medical residents with a 13.2% error rate. The error rate in the first 6 months after ACLS completion among residents was 5.1%, as compared with 21.6% in the next 6 months (p = 0.033), with no impact on actual survival rate. During the study period, error rates among other groups were 8.8% in Emergency Department physicians and 17.8% among non-ACLS-trained physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The error rate found was lower than in previous studies evaluating retention of ACLS education. It is important to have regular updates in ACLS to ensure proper protocol use.[1]References
- Evaluation of advanced cardiac life support in a community teaching hospital by use of actual cardiac arrests. Makker, R., Gray-Siracusa, K., Evers, M. Heart & lung : the journal of critical care. (1995) [Pubmed]
Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenesOpen Access LicencePrivacy PolicyTerms of Useapsburg
