Direct comparison of the response of voltammetry and microdialysis to electrically evoked release of striatal dopamine.
Carbon fiber microelectrodes either were implanted directly into striatal tissue or were mounted into the outlet of microdialysis probes that were implanted into striatal tissue. This allowed voltammetry and microdialysis to be used under identical in vivo experimental conditions to monitor extracellular dopamine levels during electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle both before and after uptake inhibition with nomifensine. The marked differences between the results obtained with each technique cannot be explained on the basis of their inherent analytical attributes (sensitivity, temporal response, etc.). The results demonstrate that the microdialysis recovery factor for endogenous dopamine increases after uptake inhibition, an observation that stands in contradiction to the existing theory and practice of the microdialysis technique. The observations led to the development of a numerical model that rationalizes the observations reported herein and that allows in vivo voltammetry and in vivo microdialysis results to be interpreted within a single theoretical framework.[1]References
- Direct comparison of the response of voltammetry and microdialysis to electrically evoked release of striatal dopamine. Lu, Y., Peters, J.L., Michael, A.C. J. Neurochem. (1998) [Pubmed]
Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenesOpen Access LicencePrivacy PolicyTerms of Useapsburg