Hoffmann, R. A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters. Nature Genetics (2008)

Editor

Personal info

View

About

Terms

Javascript disabled

Please enable Javascript support in your browser to use this application.

Instructions on how to enable JavaScript on different browsers can be found here: http://www.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=23852.

[edit this page]

Fadda, G. et al.

Evaluation of the Abbott LCx Mycobacterium tuberculosis assay in comparison with culture methods in selected Italian patients.

A ligase chain reaction (LCR) DNA amplification method for the molecular diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Abbott LCx MTB) was evaluated in comparison with solid and liquid phase culture on 622 selected samples collected in two large Italian hospitals, of which 310 obtained from HIV-1 positive patients and 312 from HIV-negative individuals. The overall prevalence of mycobacteria by culture was 22% (137/622), and the apparent sensitivity and specificity of LCx vs. culture were 87.6% and 98.2%. Of the 26 culture positive/LCx negative samples, 22 were positive for MOTT and 4 for M. tuberculosis. All 9 samples positive by LCx and negative by culture were classified as true positive by clinical criteria. The final values of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for LCx rose to 96.8%, 100%, 100% and 99.2%, respectively. The adjusted sensitivity of culture methods was 89.5% for solid phase and 92.7% for Bactec. In view of the high sensitivity on both smear-positive (100%) and smear-negative (92.4%) samples and of the high negative predictive value, the LCR-based amplification method appears suitable as a routine screening method for the rapid diagnosis of M. tuberculosis in high-risk patients.[1]

References

Evaluation of the Abbott LCx Mycobacterium tuberculosis assay in comparison with culture methods in selected Italian patients. Fadda, G., Ardito, F., Sanguinetti, M., Posteraro, B., Ortona, L., Chezzi, C., Polonelli, L., Dettori, G., Conti, S., Fanti, F., Galli, C. New Microbiol. (1998) [Pubmed]

Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenes Open Access Licence Privacy Policy Terms of Use apsburg

The world's first wiki where authorship really matters (Nature Genetics, 2008). Due credit and reputation for authors. Imagine a global collaborative knowledge base for original thoughts. Search thousands of articles and collaborate with scientists around the globe.