Biases in the laboratory diagnosis of depression in medical practice.
Several studies, conducted in psychiatric settings, have reported that the dexamethasone suppression test (ST) is useful in the diagnosis of endogenous depression. To determine whether the test has clinical utility in internal medicine practice, data were reviewed and reanalyzed from all studies that evaluated the dexamethasone ST in the diagnosis of depression. In these 11 studies, the mean positive predictive value reported for the test was 84%, reflecting high prevalence of disease (50%), sensitivity (43%), and specificity (92%) in those specialized populations studied. When estimates of the prevalence and severity of conditions associated with depressed mood seen in internal medicine were used, the sensitivity dropped to 30%, and the specificity to 85%. Assuming a prevalence of 20%, a figure based on available epidemiologic data, the predictive value for a positive test would be 33%, too low to have value in most clinical settings. Data from studies currently available do not support the use of dexamethasone ST in internal medicine practice. More generally, before any test is adopted in a general medical setting, it should be studied in that setting, or available data should be reanalyzed to correct for biases affecting prevalence, sensitivity, and specificity that may inflate the test's value.[1]References
- Biases in the laboratory diagnosis of depression in medical practice. Shapiro, M.F., Lehman, A.F., Greenfield, S. Arch. Intern. Med. (1983) [Pubmed]
Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenesOpen Access LicencePrivacy PolicyTerms of Useapsburg
