A comparative evaluation of beta-catenin and plakoglobin signaling activity.
Vertebrates have two Armadillo-like proteins, beta-catenin and plakoglobin. Mutant forms of beta-catenin with oncogenic activity are found in many human tumors, but plakoglobin mutations are not commonly found. In fact, plakoglobin has been proposed to suppress tumorigenesis. To assess differences between beta-catenin and plakoglobin, we compared several of their biochemical properties. After transient transfection of 293T cells with an expression vector encoding either of the two proteins, soluble wild type beta-catenin does not significantly accumulate, whereas soluble wild type plakoglobin is readily detected. As anticipated, beta-catenin is stabilized by the oncogenic mutation S37A; however, the analogous mutation in plakoglobin (S28A) does not alter its half-life. S37A-beta-catenin activates a TCF/LEF-dependent reporter 20-fold more potently than wild type beta-catenin, and approximately 5-fold more potently than wild type or S28A plakoglobin. These differences may be attributable to an enhanced affinity of S37A beta-catenin for LEF1 and TCF4, as observed here by immunoprecipitation assays. We show that the carboxyl-terminal domain is largely responsible for the difference in signaling and that the Armadillo repeats account for the remainder of the difference. The relatively weak signaling by plakoglobin and the failure of the S28A mutation to enhance its stability, may explain why plakoglobin mutations are infrequent in malignancies.[1]References
- A comparative evaluation of beta-catenin and plakoglobin signaling activity. Williams, B.O., Barish, G.D., Klymkowsky, M.W., Varmus, H.E. Oncogene (2000) [Pubmed]
Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenesOpen Access LicencePrivacy PolicyTerms of Useapsburg
