Post-gel polymerization contraction of "low shrinkage" composite restoratives.
This study compared the post-gel contraction of two "low-shrinkage" composites (InTen-S [IS], Ivoclar-Vivadent; Aelite LS [AL], BISCO Inc) and an ormocer (Admira [AM], Voco) to two conventional mini-filled composites (Renew [RN], BISCO; Z100 [ZO], 3M ESPE). A strain-monitoring device and test configuration were used to measure the linear polymerization shrinkage associated with the various composites (A2 shade) during and up to 60 minutes post light polymerization. Each specimen was irradiated for 40 seconds using a halogen curing light (Max, Dentsply-Caulk) with an intensity of 401 mW/cm2. Five specimens were made for each composite. Data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA/Scheffe's post-hoc test at significance level 0.05. The linear percentage shrinkage immediately after light polymerization and at 60 minutes post light polymerization ranged from 0.10 +/- 0.02 to 0.40 +/- 0.02% and 0.22 +/- 0.02 to 0.60 +/- 0.05%, respectively. Post-gel shrinkage ranking of the materials was as follows: immediately after light polymerization - IS < AL < AM < ZO < RN and at 60 minutes post light polymerization - IS < AL = AM < ZO < RN. The shrinkage associated with IS, AL and AM was significantly lower than for ZO and RN immediately after light polymerization and at 1, 10, 30 and 60 minutes post light polymerization. The post-gel polymerization shrinkage of IS, AL and AM was significantly lower than conventional mini-filled composites.[1]References
- Post-gel polymerization contraction of "low shrinkage" composite restoratives. Yap, A.U., Soh, M.S. Operative dentistry. (2004) [Pubmed]
Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenesOpen Access LicencePrivacy PolicyTerms of Useapsburg
