How will we use clinical guidelines? The experience of Medicare carriers.
While support for the development of clinical guidelines is widespread, there is little agreement about how they should be used. Because cost control is the force behind the medical effectiveness movement, the payers' preference, to link clinical guidelines to reimbursement, will likely prevail. We examine the utilization review programs of Medicare Part B carriers and the carriers' attempts to use clinical guidelines to determine medical necessity for the purpose of payment. We find that because the utilization review programs are driven by concerns about cost control, the carriers' actual review process relies on aggregate utilization and spending targets that have little to do with clinical guidelines. The carriers' medical review rhetoric--using the terms medically unnecessary and fraud and abuse as synonyms--also highlights their focus on cost control and the lack of concern about why services are used inappropriately.[1]References
- How will we use clinical guidelines? The experience of Medicare carriers. Grogan, C.M., Feldman, R.D., Nyman, J.A., Shapiro, J. Journal of health politics, policy and law. (1994) [Pubmed]
Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenesOpen Access LicencePrivacy PolicyTerms of Useapsburg
