Four immunochemical methods for measuring C-reactive protein in plasma compared.
Four immunochemical methods for measuring C-reactive protein ( CRP) in plasma were compared: radial immunodiffusion (RID), electroimmunoassay (EIA), immunoturbidimetry (IT), and laser nephelometry (LN). Close agreement was found between RID and EIA (EIA = 0.96 RID + 7.7 mg/L, r = 0.977, n = 100), IT and EIA (EIA = 1.11 IT - 15.8 mg/L, r = 0.951, n = 100), IT and RID (RID = 1.10 IT - 11.5 mg/L r = 0.959, n = 94). In initial studies in 1983, LN showed good agreement with RID (LN = 0.98 RID + 11.9 mg/L, r = 0.973, n = 60). Since then, normal CRP values measured by LN have tended to increase and, at the time of the present study (1986), LN agreed poorly with other methods. The reason for this change is obscure. Having excluded the possibility of enzymatic degradation of CRP, we conclude that instrumentation problems are involved, and therefore we no longer use this method.[1]References
- Four immunochemical methods for measuring C-reactive protein in plasma compared. Grützmeier, S., von Schenck, H. Clin. Chem. (1989) [Pubmed]
Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenesOpen Access LicencePrivacy PolicyTerms of Useapsburg
