The world's first wiki where authorship really matters (Nature Genetics, 2008). Due credit and reputation for authors. Imagine a global collaborative knowledge base for original thoughts. Search thousands of articles and collaborate with scientists around the globe.

wikigene or wiki gene protein drug chemical gene disease author authorship tracking collaborative publishing evolutionary knowledge reputation system wiki2.0 global collaboration genes proteins drugs chemicals diseases compound
Hoffmann, R. A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters. Nature Genetics (2008)
 
 
 

Role of aspartate 27 of dihydrofolate reductase from Escherichia coli in interconversion of active and inactive enzyme conformers and binding of NADPH.

The apoenzyme of wild-type (WT) dihydrofolate reductase (DHRF) from Escherichia coli exists in two conformational states, Et and Ew, which differ in affinity for NADPH and in kinetic competence. Dissociation constants for the binary complex of NADPH with the two conformers differ by over 100-fold (KDt = 0.17 microM, KDw = 22 microM). Rate constants governing the interconversion of conformers are small (t1/2 for Ew----Et = 71 s), and since Ew is not catalytically competent, this conversion is accompanied by an increase in catalytic velocity. The equilibrium proportion of Et in the absence of ligands is 63%, but binding of NADPH greatly increases this proportion, and t1/2 for conversion of Ew.NADPH to Et.NADPH is 30 s. This conformational equilibrium has also been examined in mutant enzyme in which aspartate 27 is replaced by asparagine (D27N E. coli DHFR). Although ASp27 is an active site residue, it does not interact directly with bound NADPH, and in the mutant the rate constant for NADPH binding to Et is unchanged as are the dissociation constants for NADPH complexes with Et or Ew. However, for mutant apoenzyme, the proportion of Et is decreased to 18% in the absence of ligands so that the overall KD for NADPH is increased (0.15 microM for WT E. coli DHFR, 0.68 microM for D27N E. coli DHFR). The lower proportion of Et is due to a decreased rate for Ew----Et (t1/2 = 221 s) and an increased rate for Et----Ew (t1/2 = 50 s versus 120 s for WT E. coli DHFR).[1]

References

 
WikiGenes - Universities