The world's first wiki where authorship really matters (Nature Genetics, 2008). Due credit and reputation for authors. Imagine a global collaborative knowledge base for original thoughts. Search thousands of articles and collaborate with scientists around the globe.

wikigene or wiki gene protein drug chemical gene disease author authorship tracking collaborative publishing evolutionary knowledge reputation system wiki2.0 global collaboration genes proteins drugs chemicals diseases compound
Hoffmann, R. A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters. Nature Genetics (2008)
 
 
 
 
 

An evaluation of the low-pH enzymatic assay of urinary D-glucaric acid, and its use as a marker of enzyme induction in exocrine pancreatic disease.

We have evaluated a low-pH enzymatic method for measuring urinary D-glucaric acid, and its usefulness as a marker of 'enzyme induction' in patients with exocrine pancreatic disease. The coefficient of variation lay between 7.5 and 10.9% for within-batch precision, and between 7.9 and 19.8% for between-batch precision. The useful range of the method was 20-200 mumol/l, with a lower detection limit of 11 mumol/l. The molar concentration ratio of D-glucaric acid to creatinine in urine correlated with the 8-h output of D-glucaric acid (p less than 0.005): both indices were significantly higher in a group of 29 patients with exocrine pancreatic disease than in controls (median ratios 4.6 and 2.9 X 10(-3), p less than 0.005; median outputs 14.0 and 8.8 mumol/8 h, respectively, p less than 0.005). Comparison with the results of theophylline tests in the same group of patients showed that whereas 72% of patients had theophylline clearances higher than the highest value in controls, 45% of the group had increased D-glucaric acid/creatinine ratios, whilst only 21% had increased outputs of D-glucaric acid. Paradoxically, in patients with established liver disease in whom drug metabolism was impaired urinary D-glucaric acid values were amongst the highest encountered in the study. Thus, the obvious advantages of the method--non-invasive, simple, reproducible, inexpensive, easily applied to out-patients--are offset by an unacceptably low predictive value as an indicator of microsomal 'enzyme induction'.[1]

References

 
WikiGenes - Universities