Effect of amniotic fluid in corneal sensitivity and nerve regeneration after excimer laser ablation.
To examine the effect of topical application amniotic fluids on the recovery of corneal sensitivity and nerve regeneration after excimer laser photokeratectomy, excimer laser was applied to 18 rabbits (VISX 20/20, 5 Hz, 7 microns depth: nine rabbits; 100 microns depth: nine rabbits). Human amniotic fluid (AF) was topically applied to the right eyes (AF group), and a balanced salt solution (BSS) was applied to the left eyes (BSS group). Corneal sensitivity was measured by using a Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer after weeks 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, and 12. Nerve-regeneration status was evaluated after weeks 2, 4, 5, 8, and 12 by gold chloride staining. Corneal sensitivity was initially subnormal and recovered close to the normal level at week 8. The sensitivity was higher in the AF group than in the BSS control group, except at week 2. Subepithelial nerve regeneration at the laser site was detected both at week 4 in the AF group and at week 5 in the BSS group. There was no significant correlation between the nerve-regeneration state and sensitivity changes. Long striated nerve regeneration from the deep stromal nerve was remarkable at the third month, especially in the BSS group. The BSS group showed more marked scarring of the superficial stroma, compared with the AF group. The nerve regeneration at the scar site was discontinued and delayed. Subepithelial leash nerves in the AF group were more abundant than those in the BSS group. The recovery of sensitivity and nerve regeneration were faster in the AF cornea than in the BSS cornea. These results suggest that the factors in AF helped the recovery of corneal sensitivity, nerve regeneration, and reduced scar formation.[1]References
- Effect of amniotic fluid in corneal sensitivity and nerve regeneration after excimer laser ablation. Lee, H.S., Kim, J.C. Cornea (1996) [Pubmed]
Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenesOpen Access LicencePrivacy PolicyTerms of Useapsburg
