Hoffmann, R. A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters. Nature Genetics (2008)

Editor

Personal info

View

About

Terms

Javascript disabled

Please enable Javascript support in your browser to use this application.

Instructions on how to enable JavaScript on different browsers can be found here: http://www.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=23852.

[edit this page]

Tabone, M.D. et al.

Tabone, Landman-Parker, Arcil, Coudert, Gerota, Benbunan, Leverger, Dosquet,

Are basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor prognostic indicators in pediatric patients with malignant solid tumors?

Angiogenesis plays an important role in the growth, progression, and metastasis of solid tumors. Among angiogenic factors, basic fibroblast growth factor ( bFGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) appear to be useful markers in adults with cancer. The aim of this pilot study was to determine the levels of VEGF in serum and bFGF in serum and urine of children with solid tumor at diagnosis (as measured by ELISA), and to investigate whether these parameters provide prognostic information. Forty consecutive patients with different types of cancer were prospectively included in this study. Median values of all studied angiogenic factors were higher in patients than in controls (n = 40), and the differences were statistically significant for bFGF in serum and urine: 10 versus 3 pg/ml (P = 0.0004) and 6406 versus 0 pg/g of creatinine (P < 0.0001), respectively. Among patients, median serum values of bFGF and VEGF were higher in children with metastatic disease (n = 14) than in those with localized disease (n = 26). The difference was statistically significant for serum bFGF: 17.5 versus 6 pg/ml (P = 0.02). Serum angiogenic factor levels correlated with outcome. The estimated event-free survival at 3 years was 79% for patients with normal bFGF values (n = 13) versus 42% (n = 26; P = 0.02) for those with high levels, and 71% in case of normal VEGF values (n = 20) versus 38% (n = 19; P = 0.04) for those with high levels. No benefit of normal urinary bFGF values was observed. Our results provide a rationale for exploring the clinical interest of bFGF and VEGF measurements in body fluids of a larger group of children with cancer.[1]

References

Are basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor prognostic indicators in pediatric patients with malignant solid tumors? Tabone, M.D., Landman-Parker, J., Arcil, B., Coudert, M.C., Gerota, I., Benbunan, M., Leverger, G., Dosquet, C. Clin. Cancer Res. (2001) [Pubmed]

Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenes Open Access Licence Privacy Policy Terms of Use apsburg

The world's first wiki where authorship really matters (Nature Genetics, 2008). Due credit and reputation for authors. Imagine a global collaborative knowledge base for original thoughts. Search thousands of articles and collaborate with scientists around the globe.