Hoffmann, R. A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters. Nature Genetics (2008)

Editor

Personal info

View

About

Terms

Javascript disabled

Please enable Javascript support in your browser to use this application.

Instructions on how to enable JavaScript on different browsers can be found here: http://www.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=23852.

[edit this page]

Kanagaratnam, L. et al.

Matching approved "nondedicated" hardware to obtain biventricular pacing and defibrillation: feasibility and troubleshooting.

Biventricular ICDs may offer increased benefit for patients with severe congestive heart failure and ventricular arrhythmia. Currently there are no approved dedicated biventricular ICDs available. Twenty-one consecutive patients who had approved nondedicated hardware implanted for biventricular pacing and defibrillation were included in this study. All device therapies were evaluated using stored electrograms. During mean follow-up at 13 +/- 7 months, 8 (36%) patients had inappropriate shocks. Ventricular fibrillation therapy was delivered for slow ventricular tachycardia because of double counting in two patients. In one patient, AV nodal reentrant tachycardia below detection rate cut off triggered device therapy because of ventricular double counting. Sinus tachycardia or premature atrial contraction initiating AV conduction and ventricular double counting resulted in shocks in five patients. The number of shocks per patient ranged from 1 to 64. Two patients required transient disconnection of the LV lead and subsequent ICD generator replacement for premature battery depletion. Two patients required AV junction ablation and three needed slow pathway ablation. Two patients were treated by upgrading to a device that was capable of a higher atrial tracking rate. The patients with impaired AV conduction or constant ventricular pacing did not have inappropriate therapy for sinus tachycardia or supraventricular arrhythmia. Use of conventional nondedicated hardware for biventricular pacer/defibrillator is feasible but should be considered only in patients with poor AV node function or less likely to require antitachycardic therapy, to avoid ICD double counting of ventricular sensed events and consequent high incidence of inappropriate therapies.[1]

References

Matching approved "nondedicated" hardware to obtain biventricular pacing and defibrillation: feasibility and troubleshooting. Kanagaratnam, L., Pavia, S., Schweikert, R., Marrouche, N., Lam, C., Abreu, M., Ching, E., Chung, M., Saliba, W., Niebauer, M., Wilkoff, B., Tchou, P., Natale, A. Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE. (2002) [Pubmed]

Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenes Open Access Licence Privacy Policy Terms of Use apsburg

The world's first wiki where authorship really matters (Nature Genetics, 2008). Due credit and reputation for authors. Imagine a global collaborative knowledge base for original thoughts. Search thousands of articles and collaborate with scientists around the globe.