The world's first wiki where authorship really matters (Nature Genetics, 2008). Due credit and reputation for authors. Imagine a global collaborative knowledge base for original thoughts. Search thousands of articles and collaborate with scientists around the globe.

wikigene or wiki gene protein drug chemical gene disease author authorship tracking collaborative publishing evolutionary knowledge reputation system wiki2.0 global collaboration genes proteins drugs chemicals diseases compound
Hoffmann, R. A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters. Nature Genetics (2008)
 
 
 

Differential effect of muscle vibration on intracortical inhibitory circuits in humans.

Low amplitude muscle vibration (0.5 ms; 80 Hz; duration 1.5 s) was applied in turn to each of three different intrinsic hand muscles (first dorsal interosseus, FDI; abductor pollicis brevis, APB; and abductor digiti minimi, ADM) in order to test its effect on the EMG responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Recordings were also taken from flexor and extensor carpi radialis (FCR and ECR, respectively). We evaluated the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) produced by a single TMS pulse, short interval intracortical inhibition and facilitation (SICI and ICF) and long interval intracortical inhibition (LICI). TMS pulses were applied 1 s after the start of vibration with subjects relaxed throughout. Vibration increased the amplitude of MEPs evoked in the vibrated muscle (162 +/- 6 % of MEP with no vibration; mean +/- S.E.M.), but suppressed MEPs in the two non-vibrated hand muscles (72 +/- 9 %). Compared with no vibration (test response reduced to 51 +/- 5 % of control), there was less SICI in the vibrated muscle (test response reduced to 92 +/- 28 % of control) and more in the non-vibrated hand muscles (test response reduced to 27 +/- 5 % of control). The opposite occurred for LICI: compared with the no vibration condition (test response reduced to 33 +/- 6 % control), there was more LICI in the vibrated muscle (test response reduced to 17 +/- 3 % control) than in the non-vibrated hand muscles (test response reduced to 80 +/- 11 % control) even when the intensity of the test stimulus was adjusted to compensate for the changes in baseline MEP. There was no effect on ICF. Cutaneous stimulation of the index finger (80 Hz, 1.5 s duration, twice sensory threshold) had no consistent differential effect on any of the parameters. We conclude that vibratory input from muscle can differentially modulate excitability in motor cortical circuits.[1]

References

  1. Differential effect of muscle vibration on intracortical inhibitory circuits in humans. Rosenkranz, K., Rothwell, J.C. J. Physiol. (Lond.) (2003) [Pubmed]
 
WikiGenes - Universities