Intraperitoneal versus extraperitoneal insufflation of carbon dioxide as for laparoscopy.
In order to compare the effects of intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal insufflation of CO2, we obtained blood gas measurements and chest radiographs in dogs during insufflation into three sites: the peritoneal cavity alone, the retroperitoneal space with communication into the peritoneal cavity, and the retroperitoneal space alone. The blood pH fell a mean of 0.11 +/- 0.03 and the PaCO2 rose a mean of 16.0 +/- 3.7 mm Hg when insufflation included the peritoneal cavity, whereas when insufflation was limited to the retroperitoneum, the pH fell a mean of 0.05 +/- 0.03 and the PaCO2 rose a mean of 7.5 +/- 2.8 mm Hg. Extrapleural thoracic dissection of gas was noted in one animal after insufflation limited to the retroperitoneal space. These findings confirm that there is significant absorption of CO2 from the peritoneal cavity during laparoscopy with CO2 insufflation, whether the pneumoperitoneum is primary or occurs secondary to retroperitoneal insufflation. If the insufflated gas is limited to the retroperitoneal space, however, the absorption of CO2 appears to be reduced in this animal model. The risk of thoracic dissection of gas may be greater during extraperitoneal insufflation than during intraperitoneal insufflation.[1]References
- Intraperitoneal versus extraperitoneal insufflation of carbon dioxide as for laparoscopy. Wolf, J.S., Carrier, S., Stoller, M.L. J. Endourol. (1995) [Pubmed]
Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenesOpen Access LicencePrivacy PolicyTerms of Useapsburg
