Gap junction gating sensitivity to physiological internal calcium regardless of pH in Novikoff hepatoma cells.
Gap junction conductance (Gj) and channel gating sensitivity to voltage, Ca2+, H+, and heptanol were studied by double whole-cell clamp in Novikoff hepatoma cell pairs. Channel gating was observed at transjunctional voltages (Vj) > +/- 50 mV. The cells readily uncoupled with 1 mM 1-heptanol. With heptanol, single (gap junctional) channel events with unitary conductances (gamma j) of 46 and 97 pS were detected. Both Ca(2+)-loading (EGTA.Ca) and acidifying (100% CO2) solutions caused uncoupling. However, CO2 was effective when Ca2+i was buffered with EGTA (a H(+)-sensitive Ca-buffer) but not with BAPTA (1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid) (a H(+)-insensitive Ca-buffer), suggesting a Ca(2+)-mediated H+ effect on gap junctions. This was tested by monitoring the Gj decay at different pCai values (9, 6.9, 6.3, 6, and 5.5; 1 mM BAPTA) and pHi values (7.2 or 6.1, 10 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid and 2-(N-morpholino)ethansulphonic acid, respectively). With pCai > or = 6.9 (pH 7.2 or 6.1), Gj decreased to 10-70% of initial values in approximately 40 min, following single exponential decays (tau = approximately 28 min). With pCai 6-6.3 (pH 7.2 or 6.1), Gj decreased to 10-25% of initial values in 15 min (tau = approximately 5 min); the Student t gave a P = 0.0178. With pCa 5.5 the cells uncoupled in less than 1 min (tau = approximately 20 s). Low pHi affected neither time course nor shape of Gj decay at any pCai tested. The data indicate that these gap junctions are sensitive to [Ca2+]i in the physiological range (< or = 500 nM) and that low pHi, without an increase in [Ca2+]i, neither decreases Gj nor increases channel sensitivity to Ca2+.[1]References
- Gap junction gating sensitivity to physiological internal calcium regardless of pH in Novikoff hepatoma cells. Lazrak, A., Peracchia, C. Biophys. J. (1993) [Pubmed]
Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenesOpen Access LicencePrivacy PolicyTerms of Useapsburg
