The impact of Filgrastim schedule variation on hematopoietic recovery post-chemotherapy.
BACKGROUND: A phase 2 trial was done to study effects of varying treatment schedule of Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF) on hematologic recovery following chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients with extensive small-cell carcinoma of the lung were randomized to receive one of three Filgrastim schedules following cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide ( CAE) chemotherapy for up to six cycles of treatment. Chemotherapy was delivered on days 1-3 of each 21-day cycle with Filgrastim initiated at 5 micrograms/kg/day subcutaneously (SC) beginning on day 4, day 6, or day 8 and continuing until post-nadir neutrophil recovery. RESULTS: During the first cycle of chemotherapy, the duration of neutropenia was similar for all three schedules; however, the pattern of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery differed. In subsequent cycles of treatment, an improvement in the severity of neutropenia occurred in patients on the day-4 and day-6 schedules compared with the first cycle of chemotherapy. By contrast, patients on the day-8 schedule continued to experience neutropenia similar to that seen in cycle one. Patients on the day-8 schedule also experienced a greater magnitude of grade IV thrombocytopenia in later cycles of treatment. CONCLUSION: Timing of Filgrastim administration post-chemotherapy has profound effects on hematologic recovery. Delay of Filgrastim until day 8 was associated with suboptimal hematologic recovery compared with administration of Filgrastim on day 4 or day 6. Initiation of Filgrastim on day 4 or day 6 showed a similar pattern of hematologic recovery. Beginning Filgrastim on day 6 is associated with a decrease in the total dose of Filgrastim administered.[1]References
- The impact of Filgrastim schedule variation on hematopoietic recovery post-chemotherapy. Crawford, J., Kreisman, H., Garewal, H., Jones, S.E., Shoemaker, D., Pupa, M.R., Armstrong, S., Tomita, D., Dziem, G. Ann. Oncol. (1997) [Pubmed]
Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenesOpen Access LicencePrivacy PolicyTerms of Useapsburg
