Bone regeneration in segmental defects with resorbable polymeric membranes: IV. Does the polymer chemical composition affect the healing process?
Diaphyseal segmental defects 10 mm in length in the radii of 36 skeletally mature rabbits were covered with tubular microporous membranes prepared from poly(L/D-lactide) (18 rabbits) and poly(L/DL-lactide) (18 rabbits) to determine whether chemical composition of the membrane affected the bone healing in the defect. The results of a previous study in which similar defects of the rabbits radii were not covered with membranes or covered with poly(L-lactide) membranes were used as controls. The control defects were rapidly filled with overlying muscle and soft tissues, producing a radio-ulnar synostosis. The osseous activity of control defects was limited to the bone ends. The defects covered with membranes were progressively filled with new bone. At 1 year, complete bone regeneration in the defects covered with the poly(L/D-lactide) membrane was found in 16 cases, no regeneration in 1 animal and pseudoarthrosis in 1 animal. For the poly(L/DL-lactide) membrane there was complete bone regeneration in 17 cases (1 animal died during surgery). The quality of the interface between the new bone and the membrane seemed to be affected by the chemical structure of the polylactides used for membranes preparation. For poly(L/D-lactide), the connective tissue layer entirely separated the new bone from the polymeric membrane. This has been observed before for poly(L-lactide) membranes. In the case of poly(L/DL-lactide) the new bone was formed in some places in direct contact with the membrane and the membrane fragments were osteointegrated. The differences in chemical composition of the polylactide membranes did not have an evident effect on the bone regeneration process in segmental defects of the rabbit radii.[1]References
- Bone regeneration in segmental defects with resorbable polymeric membranes: IV. Does the polymer chemical composition affect the healing process? Gogolewski, S., Pineda, L., Büsing, C.M. Biomaterials (2000) [Pubmed]
Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenesOpen Access LicencePrivacy PolicyTerms of Useapsburg
