Hoffmann, R. A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters. Nature Genetics (2008)

Editor

Personal info

View

About

Terms

Javascript disabled

Please enable Javascript support in your browser to use this application.

Instructions on how to enable JavaScript on different browsers can be found here: http://www.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=23852.

[edit this page]

Kalinowski, M. et al.

Kalinowski, Kress, Wels, Alfke, Klose, Wagner,

X-ray digital subtraction angiography with 1 mol/L gadobutrol: results from a comparative porcine study With iodinated contrast agents.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate prospectively diagnostic accuracy of 1 mol/L gadobutrol as a contrast agent for intraarterial x-ray digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in comparison to iodinated, nonionic contrast media and 0.5 mol/L gadolinium-DTPA. METHODS: Flush arteriograms (ascending, descending, abdominal aorta, iliac, and femoral arteries) and selective angiograms (carotid, renal, and visceral arteries) were obtained from bilateral femoral arterial access (5 F sheaths) in 10 domestic pigs (70 kg body weight). Digital subtracted angiograms were obtained during injection of undiluted 1 mol/L gadobutrol, 300 mg I/mL iopromide, or 0.5 mol/L gadopentetate. Injection parameters (volume and velocity) were similar for all three contrast agents. In paired arteries, two different contrast media were used during the same angiographic run. Diagnostic quality and accuracy of the angiograms were evaluated on a three-step scale by three independent blinded investigators. RESULTS: Sufficient nonselective angiographic images were obtained in 90% of cases using iodinated contrast material. Gadobutrol achieved sufficient nonselective angiograms in 64%. Selective angiograms were sufficient in 98% using iodinated contrast material, 90% using 1 mol/L Gadobutrol and 48% using 0.5 mol/L Gd-DTPA. Adverse reactions to any of the used contrast agents were not noted. CONCLUSION: One mol/L Gadobutrol solution allows x-ray digital subtraction angiography with a diagnostic accuracy equivalent to 300 mg/mL iodinated contrast media, if selective injections are performed. Flush aortograms are of inferior image quality to iodinated contrast material.[1]

References

X-ray digital subtraction angiography with 1 mol/L gadobutrol: results from a comparative porcine study With iodinated contrast agents. Kalinowski, M., Kress, O., Wels, T., Alfke, H., Klose, K.J., Wagner, H.J. Investigative radiology. (2002) [Pubmed]

Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenes Open Access Licence Privacy Policy Terms of Use apsburg

The world's first wiki where authorship really matters (Nature Genetics, 2008). Due credit and reputation for authors. Imagine a global collaborative knowledge base for original thoughts. Search thousands of articles and collaborate with scientists around the globe.