Hoffmann, R. A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters. Nature Genetics (2008)

Editor

Personal info

View

About

Terms

Javascript disabled

Please enable Javascript support in your browser to use this application.

Instructions on how to enable JavaScript on different browsers can be found here: http://www.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=23852.

[edit this page]

Masquelier, B. et al.

Masquelier, Tamalet, Montès, Descamps, Peytavin, Bocket, Wirden, Izopet, Schneider, Ferré, Ruffault, Palmer, Trylesinski, Miller, Brun-Vézinet, Costagliola,

Genotypic determinants of the virological response to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-experienced patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the genotypic determinants of the virological response to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in a multicentre cohort of antiretroviral (ARV)-experienced patients receiving TDF as a part of a salvage therapy. METHODS: HIV-1 genotype was assessed at baseline in a subgroup of 161 patients of the French expanded access program receiving a stable TDF-including regimen for 3 months or more. Reverse transcriptase mutations associated with the viral load decrease at month 3 with a P-value <0.15 were retained for the construction of a mutation score. The score was then validated using a multivariate analysis and bootstrap resampling method. RESULTS: The strongest association with decrease in viral load was observed with a set of seven mutations (TDF mutation score) that consisted of M41L, E44D, D67N, T69D/N/S, L74V, L210W and T215Y/F RT mutations. The RT K65R mutation and the insertions at codon 69 were not included in the analysis due to low prevalences. A TDF mutation score of < or = 2 predicted the absence of resistance to TDF and > or = 6 mutations predicted resistance to TDF with corresponding reductions in viral load of -1.3 +/- 1.1, and +0.1 +/- 0.7 log10 copies/ml, respectively. In patients with a TDF mutation score of 3-5, the decrease in viral load was -0.8 +/- 1.0 log10 copies/ml and was considered possibly resistant. In the multivariate analysis, a TDF mutation score > or = 6, previous use of amprenavir, indinavir and lopinavir, and co-prescription of didanosine were associated with a worse virological response. The bootstrap analysis showed the robustness of the TDF mutation score. CONCLUSION: In ARV-experienced patients receiving TDF-containing regimens, a score derived from seven reverse transcriptase mutations was shown to be independently predictive of the virological response.[1]

References

Genotypic determinants of the virological response to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-experienced patients. Masquelier, B., Tamalet, C., Montès, B., Descamps, D., Peytavin, G., Bocket, L., Wirden, M., Izopet, J., Schneider, V., Ferré, V., Ruffault, A., Palmer, P., Trylesinski, A., Miller, M., Brun-Vézinet, F., Costagliola, D. Antivir. Ther. (Lond.) (2004) [Pubmed]

Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenes Open Access Licence Privacy Policy Terms of Use apsburg

The world's first wiki where authorship really matters (Nature Genetics, 2008). Due credit and reputation for authors. Imagine a global collaborative knowledge base for original thoughts. Search thousands of articles and collaborate with scientists around the globe.