The world's first wiki where authorship really matters (Nature Genetics, 2008). Due credit and reputation for authors. Imagine a global collaborative knowledge base for original thoughts. Search thousands of articles and collaborate with scientists around the globe.

wikigene or wiki gene protein drug chemical gene disease author authorship tracking collaborative publishing evolutionary knowledge reputation system wiki2.0 global collaboration genes proteins drugs chemicals diseases compound
Hoffmann, R. A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters. Nature Genetics (2008)
 
 
 
 
 

Diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis: comparison of clinical evaluation, ultrasound, plethysmography, and venoscan with X-ray venogram.

In 50 patients with suspected deep-vein thrombosis the diagnostic accuracy of standardised clinical examination, doppler ultrasound, impedance plethysmography, and technetium-99m-labelled-fibrinogen scintigraphy (venoscan) was compared with that of X-ray venography. Physical examination was the least accurate method. Impedance plethysmography, venoscan, and ultrasound had accuracies of 65%, 80%, and 82%, respectively. The initial X-ray venogram report had an accuracy of 90% compared with the interpretation of two experienced radiologists. The venoscan was equivocal in 32% of patients, and in the remaining patients the accuracy was 97%. Objective methods of investigation are essential for diagnosing deep-vein thrombosis. Of those tested, the X-ray venogram was the only investigation suitable for definitive diagnosis. The venoscan may have a role as a screening procedure, to be followed by X-ray venography in patients with equivocal venoscan results.[1]

References

  1. Diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis: comparison of clinical evaluation, ultrasound, plethysmography, and venoscan with X-ray venogram. Sandler, D.A., Martin, J.F., Duncan, J.S., Blake, G.M., Ward, P., Ramsay, L.E., Lamont, A.C., Ross, B., Sherriff, S., Walton, L. Lancet (1984) [Pubmed]
 
WikiGenes - Universities