Pediatric urography: comparison of metrizamide and methylglucamine diatrizoate.
A non-ionic contrast medium (metrizamide) was compared to an ionic agent (methylglucamine diatrizoate) for pediatric urography. Fifty children were divided into two age groups: under 5, and 5 to 10. In younger children, metrizamide gave more excellent images (19% vs. 0%) and fewer inadequate images (0% vs. 18%) than methylglucamine diatrizoate (p = 0.06). In older children, metrizamide likewise gave more excellent images (44% vs. 14%) and fewer inadequate images (0% vs. 7%). The same pattern was seen when the two groups were combined (excellent, 28% vs. 8%; inadequate, 0% vs. 12%) (p = 0.05). Differences with respect to changes in hematocrit, serum osmolality, serum sodium, and SGOT were statistically significant, but not adverse reactions. In terms of both efficacy and safety, the authors conclude that metrizamide is preferred for pediatric urography.[1]References
- Pediatric urography: comparison of metrizamide and methylglucamine diatrizoate. Robey, G., Reilly, B.J., Carusi, P.A., Nguyen, K.B. Radiology. (1984) [Pubmed]
Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenesOpen Access LicencePrivacy PolicyTerms of Useapsburg
