Hoffmann, R. A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters. Nature Genetics (2008)

Editor

Personal info

View

About

Terms

Javascript disabled

Please enable Javascript support in your browser to use this application.

Instructions on how to enable JavaScript on different browsers can be found here: http://www.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=23852.

[edit this page]

Roy, S. et al.

Oral trovafloxacin compared with intravenous cefoxitin in the prevention of bacterial infection after elective vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy for nonmalignant disease. Trovafloxacin Surgical Group.

BACKGROUND: Trovafloxacin is a new fourth-generation fluoroquinolone whose pharmacokinetics and in vitro activity suggest that it is well suited for antibiotic prophylaxis in elective hysterectomy. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, parallel groups of women 18 years of age or older received either 200 mg trovafloxacin by mouth and intravenous (i.v.) placebo or 2 g cefoxitin by i.v. infusion and placebo by mouth before elective vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy for nonmalignant disease. RESULTS: In the 103 and 97 patients in the trovafloxacin and cefoxitin groups, respectively, who were evaluable for efficacy, the prophylactic success rates at hospital discharge (96% in both groups) and 30 +/- 6 days after hysterectomy (88% and 91% in the trovafloxacin and cefoxitin groups, respectively) were statistically equivalent. Both antibiotics were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: A single oral 200 mg dose of trovafloxacin is as effective and safe as a standard cefoxitin parenteral regimen in the prevention of primary bacterial infection after elective vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy for nonmalignant disease.[1]

References

Oral trovafloxacin compared with intravenous cefoxitin in the prevention of bacterial infection after elective vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy for nonmalignant disease. Trovafloxacin Surgical Group. Roy, S., Hemsell, D., Gordon, S., Godwin, D., Pearlman, M., Luke, D. Am. J. Surg. (1998) [Pubmed]

Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenes Open Access Licence Privacy Policy Terms of Use apsburg

The world's first wiki where authorship really matters (Nature Genetics, 2008). Due credit and reputation for authors. Imagine a global collaborative knowledge base for original thoughts. Search thousands of articles and collaborate with scientists around the globe.