Hoffmann, R. A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters. Nature Genetics (2008)

Editor

Personal info

View

About

Terms

Javascript disabled

Please enable Javascript support in your browser to use this application.

Instructions on how to enable JavaScript on different browsers can be found here: http://www.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=23852.

[edit this page]

Richter, M. et al.

Richter, Amiot, Neller, Kluger, Puhl,

Computer-assisted surgery in posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine: an in-vitro feasibility study.

Transarticular C1/2 screws are widely used in posterior cervical spine instrumentation. The use of pedicle screws in the cervical spine remains uncommon. Due to superior biomechanical stability compared to lateral mass screws, pedicle screws can be used, especially for patients with poor bone quality or defects in the anterior column. Nevertheless there are potential risks of iatrogenic damage to the spinal cord, nerve roots or the vertebral artery associated with both posterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether C1/2 transarticular screws as well as transpedicular screws in C3 and C4 can be applied safely and with high accuracy using a computer-assisted surgery (CAS) system. We used 13 human cadaver C0-C5 spine segments. We installed 1.4-mm Kirschner wires transarticular in C 1/2, using a specially designed guide, and drilled 2.5-mm pedicle holes in C3 and C4 with the assistance of the CAS system. Hole positions were evaluated by palpation, CT and dissection. Forty-eight (92%) of the 52 drilled pedicles were correctly positioned after palpation, imaging and dissection. The vertebral artery was not injured in any specimen. All of the 26 C1/2 Kirschner wires were placed properly after imaging and dissection evaluations. No injury to vascular or bony structures was observed. C /2 transarticular screws as well as transpedicular screws in the cervical spine can be applied safely and with high accuracy using a CAS system in vitro. Therefore, this technique may be used in a clinical setting, as it offers improved accuracy and reduced radiation dose for the patient and the medical staff. Nevertheless, users should take note of known sources of possible faults causing inaccuracies in order to prevent iatrogenic damage. Small pedicles, with a diameter of less than 4.0 mm, may not be suitable for pedicle screws.[1]

References

Computer-assisted surgery in posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine: an in-vitro feasibility study. Richter, M., Amiot, L.P., Neller, S., Kluger, P., Puhl, W. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. (2000) [Pubmed]

Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenes Open Access Licence Privacy Policy Terms of Use apsburg

The world's first wiki where authorship really matters (Nature Genetics, 2008). Due credit and reputation for authors. Imagine a global collaborative knowledge base for original thoughts. Search thousands of articles and collaborate with scientists around the globe.