Hoffmann, R. A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters. Nature Genetics (2008)

Editor

Personal info

View

About

Terms

Javascript disabled

Please enable Javascript support in your browser to use this application.

Instructions on how to enable JavaScript on different browsers can be found here: http://www.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=23852.

[edit this page]

Narita, M. et al.

Narita, Suzuki, Narita, Niikura, Nakamura, Miyatake, Yajima, Suzuki,

mu-Opioid receptor internalization-dependent and -independent mechanisms of the development of tolerance to mu-opioid receptor agonists: Comparison between etorphine and morphine.

A growing body of evidences suggests that receptor desensitization is implicated in the development of tolerance to opioids, which is generally regulated by protein kinases and receptor trafficking proteins. In the present study, we demonstrated that repeated s.c. treatment with etorphine, but not morphine, produced a significant increase in protein levels of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2, dynamin II, beta-arrestin 2 and phosphorylated-conventional protein kinase C in membranes of the mouse spinal cord, suggesting that the etorphine-induced mu-opioid receptor desensitization may result from G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2/dynaminII/beta-arrestin2-dependent phosphorylation of mu-opioid receptors. Unlike etorphine, morphine failed to change the levels of these trafficking proteins. Furthermore, we found that the level of glial fibrillary acidic protein in the mouse spinal cord was clearly increased by chronic in vivo and in vitro treatment with morphine, whereas no such effect was noted by etorphine. In the behavioral study, intraperitoneal pretreatment with the glial-modulating agent propentofylline suppressed the development of tolerance to morphine-induced antinociception. In addition, intrathecal injection of astrocytes and astrocyte-conditioned medium mixture, which were obtained from cultured astrocytes of the newborn mouse spinal cord, aggravated the development of tolerance to morphine. In contrast, these agents failed to affect the development of tolerance induced by etorphine. These findings provide direct evidence for the distinct mechanisms between etorphine and morphine on the development of tolerance to spinal antinociception. These findings raise the possibility that the increased astroglia response produced by chronic morphine could be associated with the lack of mu-opioid receptor internalization.[1]

References

mu-Opioid receptor internalization-dependent and -independent mechanisms of the development of tolerance to mu-opioid receptor agonists: Comparison between etorphine and morphine. Narita, M., Suzuki, M., Narita, M., Niikura, K., Nakamura, A., Miyatake, M., Yajima, Y., Suzuki, T. Neuroscience (2006) [Pubmed]

Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenes Open Access Licence Privacy Policy Terms of Use apsburg

The world's first wiki where authorship really matters (Nature Genetics, 2008). Due credit and reputation for authors. Imagine a global collaborative knowledge base for original thoughts. Search thousands of articles and collaborate with scientists around the globe.