The role of H.I.D.A./P.I.P.I.D.A. scanning in diagnosing cystic duct obstruction.
A newer approach to the early diagnosis of acute biliary tract disease is review. Ninety-two patients were evaluated with a new hepatobiliary agent (H.I.D.A/P.I.P.D.A.) for the presence of cystic duct obstruction. Seven patients with suspected acute gall bladder disease were dropped from the study for the lack of pathologic confirmation of the diagnosis. Forty-four of the remaining 85 patients were subsequently operated on and found to have acute cholecystitis. Forty-three of the 44 had cystic duct obstruction demonstrated on H.I.D.A. Scan (one false negative). An additional 23 patients underwent cholecystectomy for chronic disease. In this group, the gallbladder scan was only 43% (10/23) accurate in correctly identifying disease. Eighteen patients with nonbiliary disease had normal scans. The accuracy of ultrasonography and the scan are also compared in a smaller subgroup of 53 patients who had both studies.[1]References
- The role of H.I.D.A./P.I.P.I.D.A. scanning in diagnosing cystic duct obstruction. Suarez, C.A., Block, F., Bernstein, D., Serafini, A., Rodman, G., Zeppa, R. Ann. Surg. (1980) [Pubmed]
Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenesOpen Access LicencePrivacy PolicyTerms of Useapsburg
