Early cerebral functional outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery using different acid-base management during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass.
BACKGROUND: Cerebral injury can render meaningless an otherwise successful cardiac operation. As carbon dioxide management during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass has a major impact on cerebral blood flow during bypass, it may also influence postoperative cerebral function. The objective of this prospective, controlled, double-blind study was to compare the effect of pH-stat (temperature correction of blood gas analyses) or alpha-stat (no temperature correction) on brain function. METHODS: Cerebral function was assessed non-invasively using neurological examination, a neuropsychological test battery, quantitative electroencephalogram and the cognitive evoked potential P300 preoperatively and on postoperative day 7 or 8. Forty-five patients undergoing elective aortocoronary bypass grafting in barbiturate/opiate anesthesia were randomised into a pH-stat-(n = 23) and an alpha-stat-group (n = 22). Membrane oxygenators with arterial line filtration and non-pulsatile flow at a perfussion pressure of 50-60 mmHg were used throughout. RESULTS: One patient in each group developed a new paresis. Among 49 comparisons of cerebral function parameters, only 3 showed significant differences at the 5%-level, i.e. exactly what is expected purely by chance. These differences were too small to be clinically relevant and favored either pH-stat (theta-amplitude) or alpha-stat (subtest 3 of syndrome-short-test, number of mistakes in aiming). CONCLUSION: Under the bypass conditions of this study there was no difference in early cerebral functional outcome between pH-or alpha-stat carbon dioxide management during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass.[1]References
- Early cerebral functional outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery using different acid-base management during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. Engelhardt, W., Dierks, T., Pause, M., Hartung, E. Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. (1996) [Pubmed]
Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenesOpen Access LicencePrivacy PolicyTerms of Useapsburg