Development of a toxicological gene array and quantitative assessment of this technology.
High-density arrays of DNA bound to solid substrates offer a powerful approach to identifying changes in gene expression in response to toxicants. While DNA arrays have been used to explore qualitative changes in gene regulation, less attention has focused on the quantitative aspects of this technology. Arrays containing expressed sequence tags for xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes, proteins associated with glutathione regulation, DNA repair enzymes, heat shock proteins, and housekeeping genes were used to examine gene expression in response to beta-naphthoflavone (beta-NF). Upregulation of cytochrome P4501a1 (Cyp1a1) and 1a2 in mouse liver was maximal 8 h after beta-NF administration. Significant upregulation of Cyp1a2 was noted at beta-NF doses as low as 0.62 and 1.2 mg/kg when gene expression was measured by microarray or Northern blotting, respectively. Maximal Cyp1a2 induction is 5-fold by Northern analysis and 10-fold by microarray. Induction of Cyp1a1 was 15- and 20-fold by Northern and microarray analysis, respectively. The coefficient of variation for spot to spot and slide to slide comparisons was <15%; this variability was smaller than interanimal variability (18-60%). Comparison of mRNA expression in control animals indicated that there are differences in labeling/detection associated with Cy3/Cy5 dyes; accordingly, experiments must include methods for establishing baseline signals for all genes. We conclude that the dynamic range and sensitivity of DNA microarrays on glass slides is comparable to Northern blotting analysis and that variability of the data introduced during spotting and hybridization is less than the interanimal variability.[1]References
- Development of a toxicological gene array and quantitative assessment of this technology. Bartosiewicz, M., Trounstine, M., Barker, D., Johnston, R., Buckpitt, A. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. (2000) [Pubmed]
Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenesOpen Access LicencePrivacy PolicyTerms of Useapsburg
