Hoffmann, R. A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters. Nature Genetics (2008)

Editor

Personal info

View

About

Terms

Javascript disabled

Please enable Javascript support in your browser to use this application.

Instructions on how to enable JavaScript on different browsers can be found here: http://www.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=23852.

[edit this page]

Daskalakis, G.J. et al.

Misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination in women with prior caesarean section.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a previous caesarean section increases the risk for complications in women undergoing a mid-trimester pregnancy termination by labour induction. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of case records between 1997 and 2002. SETTING: Fetal Medicine Unit of a large teaching hospital. POPULATION: One hundred and eight women with a previous caesarean section (study group) and 216 women without such a history (controls), who underwent a second trimester termination of pregnancy. METHODS: All the terminations were performed between 17 and 24 weeks of gestation by using 400 mug of oral administration of misoprostol in combination with 400 mug of intravaginal misoprostol. The same dose of intravaginal misoprostol was repeated every 6 hours for a maximum of five doses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Severe haemorrhage requiring blood transfusion, post-abortal infection, retained placenta and uterine rupture. RESULT: Complications occurred in 16 out of 108 women of the study group (15%) and in 26 out of 216 of the controls (12%), with only one ruptured uterus in the control group. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence that a previous caesarean delivery affects the incidence of complications when women with such a history undergo a mid-trimester pregnancy termination with misoprostol.[1]

References

Misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination in women with prior caesarean section. Daskalakis, G.J., Mesogitis, S.A., Papantoniou, N.E., Moulopoulos, G.G., Papapanagiotou, A.A., Antsaklis, A.J. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. (2005) [Pubmed]

Annotations and hyperlinks in this abstract are from individual authors of WikiGenes or automatically generated by the WikiGenes Data Mining Engine. The abstract is from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.About WikiGenes Open Access Licence Privacy Policy Terms of Use apsburg

The world's first wiki where authorship really matters (Nature Genetics, 2008). Due credit and reputation for authors. Imagine a global collaborative knowledge base for original thoughts. Search thousands of articles and collaborate with scientists around the globe.